Date of Award


Document Type

Union College Only

Degree Name

Bachelor of Science



Second Department


First Advisor

Leo Zaibert

Second Advisor

Robert Baker


eugenics, utilitarianism, forced sterilization, moral change, immigration


The American eugenics movement of the early 20th century represents one of the largest-scale human rights violations in the nation’s recent history. A societal attempt to improve the genetic fitness of the population, eugenics resulted in the legalization of forced sterilization in 33 states. Through the 1970s, tens of thousands of poor, mentally handicapped, and immigrant-Americans were forced to undergo invasive operations to render them incapable of procreating. While the underlying rationale for eugenics was nativist prejudice, a widely-accepted justification was that of nativist utilitarianism. Nativist utilitarianism is the pseudo-utilitarian paradigm that perceived societal benefit justifies severe harms to minority groups, namely immigrants, without regard for utilitarian protections against majority tyranny.

This thesis will provide a historical account of the American eugenics movement and its subsequent rejection, following the realization of German human rights violations during the Second World War. Additionally, this paper will examine the adoption of nativist utilitarianism among the American population during the American eugenics movement. While much of the population gradually came to reject nativist utilitarianism, it remains a common appeal in defense of draconian anti-immigrant policies. Evidence suggests that a subset of the white protestant population never rejected nativist utilitarianism, explaining the sustained appeal of such policies in current US politics.



Rights Statement

In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted.